
(Originally posted on LinkedIn)
1. Introduction
Digital transformation is no longer a topic for the future but an urgent necessity that deeply influences every aspect of life. From communication and the economy to public services, it serves as a central driver of change. Its potential is increasingly evident, particularly in public administration: processes can be simplified, costs reduced, and citizen satisfaction enhanced. Despite these clear advantages, however, digitalization in the public sector often lags behind its possibilities.
Today, citizens expect state institutions to deliver the same level of efficiency, flexibility, and user-friendliness they experience with private-sector services. While companies continuously invest in new technologies, public administration frequently falls behind—marked by outdated systems, bureaucratic structures, and a lack of connectivity between authorities. Strategic deployment of digital technologies, however, could not only improve the quality of public services but also address societal challenges such as demographic change, climate protection, and healthcare delivery more effectively.
Digital transformation extends far beyond the mere introduction of new technologies. It involves profound changes in workflows, mindsets, and organizational structures. Public authorities must learn to respond flexibly to new challenges while ensuring that no one is left behind in the ongoing digitalization process. Issues such as data protection, algorithmic transparency, and digital inclusion for all societal groups are pivotal in this context.
Objective of this Report
This report aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of digitalization in public administration and identify concrete pathways for a successful transformation. It begins with an assessment: What challenges hinder digitalization? What structural problems must be resolved? Subsequently, the report explores how new technologies—from automation and artificial intelligence to modular software solutions—can revolutionize the public sector.
A key focus is placed on international best practices that demonstrate how innovative solutions have already been successfully implemented in other countries. Whether it's automating childcare services in Portugal, digitizing building permits in Vienna, or using AI-driven fraud detection in South Korea, these examples offer valuable insights for the German context.
The report also examines the importance of robust digital infrastructure and interoperable systems, which serve as the foundation for any successful digital transformation. It highlights how to foster digital skills within the public sector, outlines the necessary legal frameworks, and addresses ethical issues associated with AI and algorithms.
The report concludes with recommendations for future strategies. These encompass both specific measures—such as optimizing recruitment and procurement—and overarching concepts, such as promoting a learning organization. The goal is to create a blueprint for modern, digital administration that not only operates efficiently but also meets the high expectations of its citizens.
2. Current Status and Challenges of Public Services
The digitalization of public services is one of the central tasks for modern administrations. It promises faster processes, greater transparency, and stronger citizen engagement. However, the current state of affairs reveals that many countries, including Germany, are still in the early stages of this transformation.
2.1 Fragmented Digital Landscape
One of the biggest challenges for the public sector is the lack of interconnected systems. Many government agencies and institutions continue to operate with isolated solutions that cannot communicate with each other. This results in media disruptions, inefficient processes, and the redundant or even multiple collection of the same data. Citizens often need to provide the same information to different offices due to the absence of a centralized data platform that enables seamless data exchange.
An example of this fragmentation is evident in the management of residential registration systems. While many cities and municipalities have digitized their databases, there is often a lack of interfaces to facilitate efficient data sharing between federal states or other government entities. This causes delays in processing applications, such as those related to relocations, wasting valuable time for citizens.
This fragmented landscape is not only a technological issue but also a result of federalism. Differing responsibilities and political interests complicate the implementation of unified standards. Additionally, concerns about data protection are frequently cited as arguments against stronger interconnectivity.
2.2 Challenges of Outdated Systems
Another central issue lies in the outdated IT systems still in use by many administrations. These systems were often developed decades ago and are not designed to integrate with modern technologies such as artificial intelligence or cloud-based platforms.
The consequences include not only high maintenance costs but also limited capacity for innovation. Any modifications or extensions to these legacy systems require significant resources, both financial and human. Moreover, these systems are often prone to security vulnerabilities, posing a significant risk in light of the increasing number of cyberattacks targeting government institutions.
A prominent example is tax administration, which in many countries relies on outdated systems. While some nations have already adopted AI-based solutions for fraud detection, this remains largely unfeasible in Germany due to the inability of existing systems to support such integrations.
Additionally, the shortage of skilled personnel hinders modernization efforts. IT specialists often prefer the private sector, where working conditions are more attractive and opportunities for professional development appear better. Consequently, the public sector must modernize not only its technology but also its organizational culture to remain appealing to talent.
3. Leveraging Technology to Optimize Public Services
The digitalization of public services can be significantly enhanced through the strategic deployment of modern technologies. Tools such as automation, artificial intelligence (AI), and modular software solutions hold immense potential for making administrative processes more efficient and user-friendly. Beyond improving service quality, these technologies can also contribute to reducing administrative costs in the long run.
3.1 Automation and Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Automation and AI serve as critical levers for transforming the public sector. By automating routine tasks, administrative costs can be reduced, and processing times shortened. For instance, repetitive processes like application handling can be automated, freeing up staff to focus on more complex responsibilities.
A practical example of this is found in Estonia, a pioneer in digital public services. In Estonia, citizens can handle nearly all administrative tasks online. The majority of these processes are automated, ranging from passport applications to vehicle registrations and tax submissions. Smart automation identifies errors and optimization opportunities, while AI-powered predictive analytics further enhance process efficiency.
AI is also increasingly utilized for decision-making purposes. In Germany, for example, AI systems could assist in reviewing tax returns by identifying inconsistencies or suspicious patterns, thereby detecting tax fraud at an early stage. Additionally, AI has the potential to bolster public safety by analyzing security data to prevent crimes.
However, the deployment of AI requires careful consideration of associated risks. Ensuring algorithmic transparency and mitigating biases or discriminatory tendencies in AI-driven decisions are essential for maintaining public trust in these technologies.
3.2 Modular Code and Open-Source Software Solutions
Modular code and open-source software offer sustainable pathways for optimizing public services. Instead of developing costly, monolithic systems that are difficult to maintain and expand, the public sector can adopt modular software solutions that are more flexible, cost-effective, and scalable.
Open-source technologies, in particular, allow for rapid adaptation and development of software. In many cases, existing solutions can be tailored by public institutions without requiring expensive commercial software licenses. This approach not only reduces costs but also promotes collaboration and knowledge-sharing among public entities, the open-source developer community, and other stakeholders.
A successful example of open-source software in the public sector is found in Vienna, where the city employs an open-source platform for processing building permit applications. This platform has significantly reduced application processing times and administrative workload by creating a digital file for each project that is accessible to all relevant parties.
Another noteworthy example of modular software solutions is South Korea's e-government initiative, which integrates a wide array of public services into a single digital platform. The platform is designed to be adaptable, enabling seamless integration of future changes or additional services.
Both examples illustrate that transitioning to modular, open systems not only enhances efficiency but also increases long-term flexibility, enabling governments to respond effectively to future technological advancements.
4. International Best Practices
The exchange of experiences and best practices across borders provides valuable insights for enhancing public services through digitalization. Various countries have implemented unique technologies and solutions to address specific challenges within their contexts. Below are four international best practices that demonstrate how digital transformation has been successfully applied in different areas of the public sector.
4.1 Automating Childcare Services in Portugal
Portugal has developed an innovative solution to automate and enhance efficiency in public administration, particularly in the area of childcare. Through a centralized digital platform, parents and childcare providers can exchange information in real-time. The system not only simplifies the enrollment process and access to childcare services but also enables more efficient management and monitoring of childcare facilities.
The platform employs AI to optimize the allocation of childcare spots and provide parents with tailored recommendations. This approach eases administrative workloads, improves resource utilization, and streamlines access to childcare services. Additionally, by managing childcare slots digitally, authorities can respond more quickly to shifts in demand and adapt to local needs with greater flexibility.
4.2 Transforming Digital Building Permits in Vienna
Vienna has successfully introduced a digital system for processing and managing building permits, which has since become a model for other cities. This system allows citizens and businesses to submit applications online and ensures that all relevant stakeholders—planners, architects, and municipal authorities—can communicate via a shared digital platform.
The system is built on open software solutions that facilitate real-time information and document exchange among participants. Automated workflows expedite application processing, reducing the risk of lost documents or unaddressed requests. The transition to a digital system has significantly shortened processing times, making it much faster compared to traditional paper-based applications.
An additional advantage of this system is its transparency. Citizens and businesses can track the status of their applications at any time, reducing bureaucratic hurdles for all parties involved and building trust in the administrative process.
4.3 Use of K-VoM in South Korea Against Voice Phishing
South Korea has developed a successful digital solution to combat voice phishing attacks, particularly targeting the elderly population. The "K-VoM" platform uses advanced AI algorithms to analyze calls in real-time and detect phishing attempts. If a fraud attempt is suspected, the call is automatically stopped, and the affected individual is alerted.
This system was developed as part of a comprehensive security framework aimed at protecting citizens from digital threats and ensuring public safety. The AI not only recognizes known phishing techniques but also identifies new, previously unknown attack patterns, allowing continuous improvement and adaptation of security measures.
K-VoM has successfully blocked numerous phishing attempts and strengthened the public’s trust in digital security measures. The project has become a successful model in the field of digital crime prevention, one that could be adopted by other countries.
Report: OPSI Call for Innovations in Public Services 2024 "Voice phishing crimes cost South Korean citizens an estimated 700 billion won annually. In this fraudulent method, criminals illegally obtain personal financial information, often targeting vulnerable groups such as the elderly. However, traditional voice identification models were inefficient and not tailored to the local language.
South Korea then developed K-VoM, the first AI-based voice analysis model for combating voice phishing crimes. K-VoM was jointly developed by researchers and government authorities and is 77% more accurate than existing solutions. It goes further by integrating a function to trace criminal voices. Voice phishing crimes are often committed by organized groups with members playing different roles. K-VoM's clustering function groups voices from different crimes to identify criminal networks.
Since its launch, K-VoM has uncovered 130 criminal organizations and led to 51 arrests. As voice phishing and related crimes, such as deep fakes, become increasingly sophisticated, the use of this AI technology enables South Korea to comprehensively address these threats, leading to faster investigations, higher arrest rates, and ultimately improving public safety."
4.4 Digital Health Application ASIK in Indonesia
Indonesia has made another significant step toward comprehensive digital transformation in the public sector with the development of the ASIK (Aplikasi Sehat Indonesia Kita) digital health application. The app allows citizens to manage their health data digitally, schedule doctor appointments, and access medical services without the need to physically visit a clinic.
The system was specifically designed to improve access to health services in rural and remote areas, where doctors and health centers are often difficult to reach. ASIK uses telemedicine to facilitate quick and efficient communication between patients and doctors and offers a variety of preventive health services and information.
This digital health platform has not only bridged the service gap in rural areas but has also improved the efficiency of the entire healthcare system by reducing waiting times and eliminating unnecessary travel. It serves as a model for integrating health services and digital solutions in an increasingly interconnected world.
4.5 Case Study 2: Italy Uses AI for Sorting Citizens’ Inquiries
In Italy, over 22 million people receive pensions and more than 25 million workers are insured through the National Institute for Social Security (INPS). As one of the largest public organizations in the country, INPS employed more than 20,000 people in 2022 and operated 448 regional offices. It serves as a key point of contact between citizens and the Italian administration, and one of the main ways citizens communicate with INPS is through certified emails.
When the COVID-19 pandemic significantly restricted in-person contact, INPS saw a sharp increase in digital communication via certified emails. Prior to this, employees manually processed these inquiries by sorting the emails by subject and forwarding them to the appropriate departments. This process was time-consuming and led to employees being overwhelmed with a large number of inquiries, resulting in delayed responses for citizens.
To handle the flood of certified emails, INPS implemented an advanced robotic automation tool. Using AI and an innovative machine learning model, the tool automatically sorts and classifies web inquiries, significantly reducing response times and allowing public servants to better manage and prioritize urgent requests. With 80% accuracy, more than two-thirds of emails are now processed automatically.
The tool was developed internally and follows strict protocols to maintain data sensitivity while complementing the work of employees. The implementation was gradual, with a focus on employee training and a comprehensive onboarding process. The tool has been successfully implemented in 10 major cities as well as medium-sized cities, and Italy plans to roll it out nationwide by the end of the year.
To further enhance its use of technology, INPS is experimenting with large language models (LLMs) to generate pre-drafted emails, speeding up and simplifying the communication process. This example highlights how AI technologies, such as robotic process automation tools, enable governments to establish stronger foundations and deliver more efficient public services to citizens.
Since the tool's introduction, more than 1 million inquiries have been processed, optimizing the processing workflow and reducing the workload of first-line staff. Simultaneously, it enables employees to focus on emails that the system may not accurately flag or where errors occur. This innovation has not only simplified email handling but also allowed INPS to better allocate human resources and respond to citizen inquiries in a timely manner, demonstrating how technological innovations can provide better value for money.
5. Digital Infrastructure Design
Designing a future-proof digital infrastructure in the public sector is not only a technological but also an organizational challenge. An efficient digital infrastructure enables the optimization of existing administrative processes, the reduction of bureaucracy, and easier access to public services for citizens and businesses. At the same time, it must meet the demands of data security, privacy, and interoperability to address the various needs and challenges. Building such infrastructures is a long-term, ongoing task, driven by both national and international initiatives, requiring continuous development and adaptation to new technologies.
5.1 National and International Initiatives
At the national level, many countries have already become active and launched a variety of initiatives to promote digital infrastructure in the public sector. A prominent example is Germany, where the “Online Access Act” (OZG) plays a central role. The goal of this law was to transfer all administrative procedures, previously handled on paper or through personal interactions, to digital platforms by 2022. This aims to simplify the interaction between citizens and authorities, speed up administrative processes, and reduce bureaucratic burdens. The law marks a milestone on the way to a fully digital administration in Germany and underscores the importance of a strong digital infrastructure.
The country’s digital infrastructure is supported by various initiatives, including the creation of a federated system for the provision of public services. The IT Planning Council, which coordinates IT infrastructure between the federal government, states, and municipalities, plays a key role in harmonizing digital services. These national efforts are crucial to ensuring the transition to a modern and efficient administration while guaranteeing seamless access to digital services for citizens.
Another impressive example of national digital innovation is Estonia, which is considered a pioneer in digital governance. Estonia has developed a fully integrated and paperless system based on blockchain technology that allows citizens to securely store their data and access a range of public services without needing to be physically present. This infrastructure is continuously developed by the Estonian government to strengthen citizen trust and make access to public services even more user-friendly and efficient.
Furthermore, international initiatives play a vital role in creating interoperable digital infrastructures. These initiatives promote cross-border exchange of administrative data and enable citizens to access services across borders. The European Union, for example, has developed the “eGovernment” project, which facilitates the cooperation and exchange of administrative data between member states. By establishing common standards and promoting interoperable IT systems, authorities in the EU can work more efficiently and improve access to public services for citizens and businesses.
Additionally, international organizations such as the United Nations and the OECD have launched initiatives to promote the exchange of best practices and technologies in digital transformation. Such global initiatives are important to develop uniform standards and foster technological progress in different countries and regions.
5.2 Relevance of Interoperable Systems
The interoperability of digital systems is crucial to ensuring effective communication and data exchange between various authorities and public institutions. The implementation of interoperable systems enables the seamless integration of different technologies and administrative processes, benefiting citizens and businesses alike. Without interoperability, different public agencies would struggle to communicate, leading to delays and inefficiencies.
A good example of the importance of interoperability is the EU's “eGovernment” project, which facilitates the exchange of administrative data between member states. This enables citizens to access services across borders without having to overcome additional bureaucracy. In countries like Estonia, which has already developed a fully digital administration system, the seamless delivery of public services relies on the interoperability of systems, allowing real-time integration of different data sources.
Creating interoperable systems requires the development of standardized protocols and interfaces that enable the secure and efficient exchange of data between different public entities. Open standards and open interfaces play a central role in this process. When authorities design their systems to communicate seamlessly with one another, this not only increases efficiency but also enhances citizens' trust in public institutions, as transparency and access to information are improved.
Another critical aspect is the scalability of digital infrastructure. When systems are designed to be flexible and scalable, they can easily adapt to future demands, whether through the introduction of new technologies or the integration of new digital services. This means that systems not only meet current requirements but are also future-proof and can be continuously developed.
The development of interoperable systems not only improves the efficiency of public administration but also ensures that new digital technologies can be integrated smoothly. This is particularly important in an era where technology is constantly evolving, and new applications like Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, or the Internet of Things are becoming increasingly important in public administration. By promoting interoperable systems, authorities can ensure they are able to respond quickly and flexibly to new technologies.
6. Development of Digital Competencies
The digital transformation of the public sector can only be successful if employees possess the necessary digital competencies. These skills are crucial for effectively utilizing new technologies and improving existing systems. The training of employees in public institutions plays a central role in the implementation of digitalization strategies. In many countries, including Germany, programs to promote digital skills are being carried out at various levels to strengthen the digital competency of employees and prepare them for the challenges of an increasingly technology-driven workplace.
6.1 Promotion of Specialized Skills in the Public Sector
The promotion of digital specialized skills starts with a solid foundation in areas such as Information Technology (IT), data management, and cybersecurity. These fundamental skills are necessary to ensure that employees in the public sector develop the technical capabilities required to work with modern tools and software applications. This also includes a sound understanding of the principles of digital administration and data protection regulations.
Additionally, it is crucial for employees to develop a deep understanding of the transformative power of new technologies. This includes the integration of Artificial Intelligence, automation, and Big Data into administration. By fostering specialized competencies, employees can work more efficiently and optimize existing administrative processes. The development of digital skills must be seen as a continuous learning process, as the digital landscape is constantly evolving.
A practical example of promoting digital competencies is the UK government’s “Digital Academy.” Here, public employees are trained in the latest digital technologies and work methods to actively drive digital transformation in their areas. Such initiatives allow public administrations to keep up with the latest developments and prepare employees for the ever-increasing demands. These programs offer not only technical training but also the opportunity to learn innovation methods like Design Thinking and agile working.
Training public sector employees must also address issues such as data protection and the ethical aspects of digitalization. Data protection is a particularly sensitive issue in the public sector, as personal data is often processed. Employees must learn how to ensure compliance with data protection regulations to strengthen citizens' trust in the public administration's digital services.
6.2 Examples from Greece and Africa
Greece has launched a remarkable program to promote digital skills as part of its digital transformation. The country has invested heavily in training public servants to ensure they are equipped with the necessary skills to successfully utilize digital administrative systems. A key component of this program was the introduction of online training and digital learning platforms, simplifying access to educational resources for public employees across the country. These measures foster the technological know-how of employees while supporting the transition to a digital administration.
In Africa, many countries have also made significant progress in developing digital skills, despite facing challenges such as limited access to educational institutions and resources. In countries like Kenya and Rwanda, which are considered pioneers in digital transformation in Africa, local initiatives are being launched to strengthen digital education. For example, in Kenya, the government has expanded the "Kenya School of Government" with digital educational offerings to enhance the IT capabilities of officials. The school offers programs in e-government, IT security, and data management, enabling public servants to effectively implement digital administration.
In Rwanda, known as "Silicon Savannah," digital competency is also actively addressed. In collaboration with international organizations and educational institutions, the government has launched a comprehensive training program providing young professionals and public employees with the opportunity to acquire digital skills. Rwanda has established itself as one of the leading countries in digital transformation in Africa and demonstrates the importance of fostering digital competence for creating a modern and efficient public administration.
These examples show that developing digital competencies in the public sector is a global priority. In countries like Greece, Kenya, and Rwanda, it is possible to pave the way for successful digital transformation through targeted educational initiatives and the development of relevant infrastructure. At the same time, governments must collaborate internationally to exchange best practices and create innovative training programs tailored to the specific challenges of each country.
6.3 Training for Adapting to Digital Transformations
With the ongoing digital transformation, public servants must increasingly be able to understand and use new technologies. To meet this challenge, targeted training programs are required that not only impart technical knowledge but also foster a creative and risk-taking mindset. These programs are crucial to create an innovation-friendly culture that allows public administration to keep pace with rapid technological developments and implement new solutions quickly and efficiently.
A standout example of such initiatives is the “Thematic Innovation Clinic” in Indonesia. This clinic offers training for public servants aimed at promoting innovation processes using Design Thinking techniques. Design Thinking is a creative approach focused on viewing complex problems from the users' perspective and developing solutions that meet both citizens' and the administration's needs. These trainings not only strengthen technical skills but also encourage critical thinking and problem-solving abilities.
Another remarkable example of promoting innovation thinking in administration is the “African Union Digital and Innovation Fellowship.” This program aims to introduce young innovators from Africa into the bureaucratic structures of the Union, initiating a cultural shift. By involving young people with fresh ideas and perspectives in public administration, a dynamic environment is created that embraces creative and unconventional solutions. These innovations contribute not only to increased efficiency but also promote positive change within traditional hierarchies of public institutions.
In Greece, the “HowTo” platform was launched to promote digital skills among both public servants and citizens. The platform offers a range of micro-courses tailored to the specific needs of Greek administration. Public employees can receive training in the latest digital tools and systems, significantly improving their ability to use new technologies and deliver efficient public services. HowTo also provides a collaborative learning environment where employees can share knowledge and best practices. A particular focus is on training citizens who may struggle with digital systems due to age, education level, or other factors. This is especially relevant for disadvantaged groups like the elderly or migrants.
Since its launch, the HowTo platform has trained more than 6,000 public employees and certified over 4,300 citizens. Additionally, around 3 million citizens access the platform annually to improve their digital skills. HowTo is an exemplary model of a user-centered initiative that promotes digital competencies and helps citizens actively participate in the digital world.
These training initiatives are crucial to ensuring that the public sector keeps pace with the demands of digital transformation. They not only contribute to improving administrative efficiency but also strengthen citizens' trust in public institutions by being transparent, inclusive, and accessible.
7. Legal and Regulatory Framework
The digital transformation of the public sector must be driven not only by technological innovations but also by a clear and robust legal framework. This framework ensures that digital developments align with existing legal requirements and ethical standards while protecting citizens' rights and freedoms. It is crucial that regulations keep pace with the rapidly evolving technological landscapes while safeguarding citizens' rights, especially concerning data protection, privacy, and the ethical use of Artificial Intelligence (AI).
7.1 Protection of Digital Rights
A central aspect of the legal framework for digital transformation is the protection of citizens' digital rights. The growing use of digital systems in the public sector leads to increased collection and processing of personal data. In this context, data protection laws are essential to ensure that the data collected is processed securely and responsibly. In the European Union, for example, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) ensures the protection of privacy and citizens' rights regarding their personal data. This regulation imposes strict requirements on the collection, storage, and processing of data, ensuring that citizens retain control over their data.
The implementation of such a legal framework is not only crucial to maintaining citizens' trust in digital public services but also to protecting public administration from the risks of data misuse and cybercrime. An effective data protection framework should also include measures for transparency and accountability of public authorities, ensuring that citizens can trust their data is used only for the intended purpose and that unauthorized use does not occur.
For example, Estonia, as a pioneer in digital governance, has established an extensive system to protect its citizens' digital rights. In Estonia, citizens can manage their data centrally and view at any time who has accessed their data. This strengthens trust in digital government services and provides greater transparency and control.
In many other countries, especially in Asia, data protection laws are still in their early stages of development, which may result in insufficient safeguarding of citizens' digital rights. In India, for example, data protection legislation has been strengthened in recent years, but many unresolved issues remain regarding its implementation and the protection of sensitive data, especially with the use of AI and Big Data.
7.2 Algorithmic Transparency and Ethical AI
Another critical component of the legal framework is the development of regulations for algorithmic transparency and the ethical use of Artificial Intelligence (AI). AI systems are playing an increasingly significant role in the public sector, from automating administrative processes to analyzing vast amounts of data. While AI offers immense potential to improve efficiency and transparency, it also raises significant ethical and legal questions.
Algorithmic decisions can directly impact citizens' lives in many areas of the public sector. Whether it is the allocation of social benefits, awarding contracts, or monitoring public safety measures, the decisions made by AI systems must be transparent and fair. It is, therefore, crucial that governments establish clear regulations on the transparency of algorithms to ensure that citizens understand how decisions are made and can challenge them if necessary.
A concrete example of promoting the ethical use of AI is the European Commission's "AI Ethics Guidelines." These guidelines define a set of principles for the use of AI, which include transparency, non-discrimination, and accountability. They also specify that AI systems must be designed to respect human rights and ethical values. Furthermore, the EU AI Regulation, expected to come into effect in 2024, will require AI systems in high-risk areas, such as the public sector, to undergo strict testing to ensure that they do not produce harmful or discriminatory outcomes.
In countries like the United States, AI regulation is still fragmented. While there is no comprehensive federal regulation, some states, such as California, have enacted their own laws that restrict the use of AI in certain areas and set transparency requirements.
Ethical AI means not only that algorithms must be transparent and fair, but also that they must be designed to consider the social impacts of their decisions. For example, AI systems in the public sector must be developed to avoid promoting discrimination or biases against certain population groups. Research and development into “fair” algorithms play a crucial role in ensuring that AI applications do not inadvertently reinforce discrimination or lead to unequal outcomes.
The introduction of a robust legal framework that covers data protection, algorithmic transparency, and ethical AI rules is essential to ensuring a just and responsible digital transformation in the public sector.
7.3 "Rules as Code" – Legislation through Computer Code
As part of the digital transformation, the concept of "Rules as Code" is increasingly being introduced, where legal regulations and policy decisions are translated into machine-readable code. This approach of implementing legislation and regulation through computer code helps make public services more efficient, transparent, and adaptable. It allows laws to be formulated in a way that is understandable and automatically interpretable by computers, which significantly reduces administrative overhead while enabling more accurate and faster application of regulations.
The advantage of "Rules as Code" lies primarily in the ability to adjust and update regulations in real-time without lengthy legislative processes. This is particularly important in dynamic areas like social policy, taxation, or environmental law, where laws and regulations need to be swiftly and precisely adapted to respond to new societal and economic challenges.
A practical example of this approach is the French project "My Helper," which helps citizens simulate their claims for social benefits by simply answering a questionnaire. The entire legal framework is translated into code, allowing users to quickly and transparently assess their claims. In New Zealand, similar solutions like "SmartStart" and "Rates Rebate"have been developed to provide citizens with information about births, parenthood, and financial support for low-income households. These platforms are based on translating legal regulations into computer-based formats, making the provision of public services more efficient and user-friendly.
In Canada, the Blawx open-source tool has been developed, which offers a user-friendly visual programming interface that allows even non-programmers to translate, test, and apply legal regulations into code. Blawx enables government agencies to design and implement rules and regulations flexibly, which is particularly advantageous in the ever-changing legal landscape.
The United Arab Emirates are also adopting this model by creating a nationwide "Rules as Code" platform to develop AI-powered laws and regulations, transforming the financial ecosystem. By implementing such solutions, not only is efficiency enhanced, but transparency and trust in public services are also strengthened.
The use of "Rules as Code" is a forward-looking step in the digitalization of public administration. It not only promotes automation and efficiency but also encourages greater citizen involvement in the legal and administrative process by making laws and regulations more accessible and understandable for all.
8. Future Strategies and Recommendations
The digital transformation of public services is a long-term process that must continuously evolve to meet the changing needs of society. To ensure that this transformation is sustainable and effective, strategic actions are needed that consider both technological innovations and organizational and cultural changes. Below are key strategies and recommendations to help public institutions optimize their digital transformation.
8.1 Optimizing Recruitment and Procurement
One of the biggest challenges in the digital transformation of public services is the shortage of skilled professionals with the necessary digital competencies. It has become increasingly clear that public administrations often struggle to attract highly qualified IT experts, data scientists, and AI developers, who are essential for implementing digital projects. This is partly due to the intense competition from the private sector, which generally offers more attractive salaries and flexible working conditions.
To address this shortage, public institutions should rethink their recruitment strategies. A key recommendation is to focus more on partnerships with educational institutions and research centers to identify and nurture talented professionals early on, offering them opportunities to enter the public sector. Internships, training programs, and collaborations with universities can help build a network of professionals who will work in public administration over the long term.
Additionally, public institutions should invest in the continuous development of existing employees. Regular training programs can prepare staff for the latest technological advancements, ensuring that digital transformation is driven not only by external experts but also by the existing workforce.
In terms of technology procurement, public administrations should increasingly focus on modular, scalable, and interoperable systems. This approach allows technologies to be implemented gradually and flexibly, without the need for a complete overhaul of the IT infrastructure. The procurement of open-source solutions and the use of agile software development methods could be a cost-effective and future-proof strategy.
8.2 Fostering a Learning Organization
Another critical step in the digital transformation is the creation of a "learning organization." This means that public administrations must not only focus on technological innovations but also adapt their internal processes and work cultures. A learning organization is capable of continuously adapting, integrating new technologies, and responding quickly to changes in its environment.
To foster this learning organization, leaders in public institutions should create an environment that encourages continuous learning and experimentation. This involves viewing mistakes as learning opportunities and encouraging employees to try out new ideas and solutions. The introduction of "innovation labs" or pilot projects within agencies could serve as platforms for such experiments.
Another key measure is the promotion of open communication and collaboration within the agency. Through interdisciplinary teams, where IT experts, administrative staff, and professionals from other fields collaborate, digital solutions can be developed that are both technologically advanced and practically feasible. Such interdisciplinary approaches have proven to be highly valuable in many successful digital projects.
8.3 Promoting Digital Inclusion
A central goal of the digital transformation of public services should be to overcome the digital divide and ensure that all citizens, regardless of their technical background, have access to the new digital offerings. Promoting digital inclusion is therefore one of the most important strategic tasks.
This includes first ensuring that all citizens have the necessary digital resources to access the offered services. This encompasses access to computers, smartphones, and a stable internet connection. Particularly in rural areas or among disadvantaged population groups, access to these resources can still be problematic. Public institutions, in collaboration with private actors, should develop initiatives that promote access to digital resources, such as free Wi-Fi zones or the expansion of digital infrastructure.
In addition, government agencies should offer digital education programs to equip all citizens with the necessary skills to handle digital technologies safely and competently. These programs should particularly target older adults, people with disabilities, and individuals from socially disadvantaged groups to ensure that no one is excluded from the benefits of digital transformation.
8.4 Ensuring the Sustainability and Resilience of Digital Infrastructure
The introduction of new digital technologies in the public sector also requires continuous adjustment and maintenance of the infrastructure to ensure it meets changing demands and remains functional in the long term. In particular, with regard to the resilience of digital infrastructure, public administrations must ensure that their systems are robust against cyberattacks and other external threats.
The implementation of security protocols, regular reviews of security standards, and investment in modern encryption technologies are crucial measures to ensure the resilience of the infrastructure. This also involves developing emergency plans and backup systems to enable a swift response in case of system failures.
Furthermore, it is important that digital infrastructures are flexible and scalable to adapt to future developments. The use of cloud technologies and other scalable solutions can allow public administrations to quickly adjust their infrastructure to changing requirements without the need for a complete overhaul.
In conclusion, the digital transformation of public services requires a range of strategic initiatives that encompass technological innovation, organizational changes, and enhanced collaboration among various stakeholders. The recommendations for optimizing recruitment and procurement, promoting a learning organization, and ensuring digital inclusion provide important action points to make the digital transformation sustainable and inclusive. In the coming years, it will be critical that public administrations not only respond to technological changes but also adjust their internal structures and work cultures to shape an efficient and equitable digital future.
9. Conclusion
The digital transformation of public services is an inevitable but challenging process that requires profound changes in the way governments and administrative bodies perform their tasks. Adapting to the digital future is not just a technical necessity but also a societal obligation aimed at providing citizens with better access to public services while enhancing the efficiency and transparency of public institutions.
The analysis has shown that the digital challenges in public administration are diverse. Particularly, the fragmentation of the digital landscape, outdated systems, and the lack of sufficiently qualified personnel present significant barriers. Nevertheless, technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), automation, and open-source solutions offer considerable potential to improve administrative processes. These technologies not only enable faster and more efficient operations but also provide a better citizen experience through tailored, user-friendly solutions.
A central point that has emerged from this study is the need for an integrated and coordinated legal and regulatory framework. To drive digital transformation in public administration, it is essential to create legal conditions that both protect citizens' data and rights while allowing for the adoption of new technologies. This also includes promoting the transparent and ethical use of AI and automation.
Another crucial aspect is the promotion of digital inclusion. Digital services must be made accessible to all citizens, regardless of their technical know-how or social background. This requires not only expanding digital infrastructure but also launching educational initiatives to ensure that no one is excluded from the digital society.
The recommendations for future strategies highlight that the successful implementation of digital transformation depends not only on technological innovations but also on a change in the internal structures and organizational culture within public administrations. Recruiting skilled personnel, fostering a learning organization, and creating a flexible and resilient infrastructure are key to shaping the digital future of administration.
In conclusion, the digital transformation of public services is not only a challenge but also a tremendous opportunity. By strategically deploying new technologies, establishing an appropriate legal framework, and promoting the digital skills of employees, public administrations can strengthen their role as efficient, transparent, and citizen-oriented institutions, paving the way for a more inclusive and just society.
References:
• OECD (2010), “Modernising government”, in Making Reform Happen: Lessons from OECD Countries, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264086296-9-en.
• Bertoni, E. et al. (eds.) (2023), Handbook of Computational Social Science for Policy, Springer International Publishing, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16624-2.
• Bianchi, C., G. Nasi and W. Rivenbark (2021), “Implementing collaborative governance: models, experiences, and challenges”, Public Management Review, Vol. 23/11, pp. 1581-1589, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1878777.
• Boyle, D. and M. Harris (2009), THE CHALLENGE OF CO-PRODUCTION: How equal partnerships between professionals and the public are crucial to improving services, NESTA, http://www.camdencen.org.uk/Resources/Public%20services/The_Challenge_of_Co-production.pdf.
• Cabinet Office (1999), Modernising government, Stationary Office, https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20131205101137/http:/www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm43/4310/4310.htm.
• Caldarelli, G. et al. (2023), “The role of complexity for digital twins of cities”, Nature Computational Science, Vol. 3/5, pp. 374-381, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-023-00431-4.
• Diefenbach, T. (2009), “NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT IN PUBLIC SECTOR ORGANIZATIONS: THE DARK SIDES OF MANAGERIALISTIC ‘ENLIGHTENMENT’”, Public Administration, Vol. 87/4, pp. 892-909, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01766.x.
• Dijk, J. et al. (2005), Alter ego, state of the art on user profiling: an overview of the most relevant organisational and behavioural aspects regarding User Profiling, Telematica Institute and University of Twente, https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/5150160/Geest05alter.pdf.
• Drake, G. et al. (2023), Open-Source Software: Three Considerations for Digital-Government Transformation, https://institute.global/insights/tech-and-digitalisation/open-source-software-considerations-digital-government-transformation.
• Dudau, A. et al. (2023), “Public service resilience post-Covid: Introduction to the special issue”, Public Management Review, Vol. 25/4, pp. 681-689, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2219690.
• Dunleavy, P. (2005), “New Public Management Is Dead–Long Live Digital-Era Governance”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 16/3, pp. 467-494, https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057.
• Dunleavy, P. and C. Hood (1994), “From old public administration to new public management”, Public Money & Management, Vol. 14/3, pp. 9-16, https://doi.org/10.1080/09540969409387823.
• Ferlie, E. (2001), “Public Management in the United Kingdom: Efficiency and Accountability”, Politiques et management public, Vol. 19/3, pp. 121-138, https://doi.org/10.3406/pomap.2001.2683.
• Gkontzis, A. et al. (2024), “Enhancing Urban Resilience: Smart City Data Analyses, Forecasts, and Digital Twin Techniques at the Neighborhood Level”, Future Internet, Vol. 16/2, p. 47, https://doi.org/10.3390/fi16020047.
• Hardyman, W. et al. (2021), “Enhancing public service innovation through value co-creation: Capacity building and the ‘innovative imagination’”, Public Money & Management, Vol. 42/5, pp. 332-340, https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1981042.
• Haynes, P. (2015), Managing Complexity in the Public Services, Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315816777.
• Höchtl, J., P. Parycek and R. Schöllhammer (2015), “Big data in the policy cycle: Policy decision making in the digital era”, Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, Vol. 26/1-2, pp. 147-169, https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2015.1125187.
• Irani, Z. et al. (2023), “The impact of legacy systems on digital transformation in European public administration: Lesson learned from a multi-case analysis”, Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 40/1, p. 101784, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101784.
• Kahneman, D., O. Sibony and C. Sunstein (2021), Noise: A flaw in human judgment, Little, Brown.
• Lee, C. and L. Ma (2019), “The Role of Policy Labs in Policy Experiment and Knowledge Transfer: A Comparison across the UK, Denmark, and Singapore”, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, Vol. 22/4, pp. 281-297, https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2019.1668657.
• Maciejewski, M. (2016), “To do more, better, faster and more cheaply: using big data in public administration”, International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 83/1_suppl, pp. 120-135, https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852316640058.
• McBride, D. et al. (2023), Proactive Public Services - the new standard for digital governments, The Centre for Digital Governance at the Hertie School, https://nortal.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/white-paper_proactive_public_services_en.pdf.
• Meroni, A. and D. Selloni (2022), “(Public) Services as Urban Commons”, in SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology, Service Design for Urban Commons, Springer International Publishing, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06035-9_3.
• Mohun, J. and A. Roberts (2020), “Cracking the code: Rulemaking for humans and machines”, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 42, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/3afe6ba5-en.
• Monteiro, B. and R. Dal Borgo (2023), “Supporting decision making with strategic foresight: An emerging framework for proactive and prospective governments.”, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 63, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/1d78c791-en.
• Newman, J. (2000), “The new public management”, Local Government Studies, Vol. 26/1, pp. 97-100, https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930008433980.
• OECD (2024), “2023 OECD Digital Government Index: Results and key findings”, OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 44, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/1a89ed5e-en.
• OECD (2024), “Fixing frictions: ‘sludge audits’ around the world: How governments are using behavioural science to reduce psychological burdens in public services”, OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 48, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5e9bb35c-en.
• OECD (2024), OECD Survey on Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions – 2024 Results: Building Trust in a Complex Policy Environment, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9a20554b-en.
• OECD (2024), Recommendation of the Council on Human-Centred Public Administrative Services, OECD Publishing, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/instruments/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0503#relatedInstruments.
• OECD (2024), The Digital Transformation of Norway’s Public Sector, OECD Digital Government Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/1620e542-en.
• OECD (2023), Civic Space Review of Portugal: Towards People-Centred, Rights-Based Public Services, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/8241c5e3-en.
• OECD (2022), Building Trust to Reinforce Democracy: Main Findings from the 2021 OECD Survey on Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions, Building Trust in Public Institutions, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/b407f99c-en.
• OECD (2021), “Achieving cross-border government innovation: Governing cross-border challenges”, OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 10, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/ddd07e3b-en.
• OECD (2021), “The OECD Framework for digital talent and skills in the public sector”, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 45, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/4e7c3f58-en.
• OECD (2020), One-Stop Shops for Citizens and Business, OECD Best Practice Principles for Regulatory Policy, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/b0b0924e-en.
• OECD (2020), “The Covid-19 crisis: A catalyst for government transformation?”, OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19), OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0c0788-en.
• OECD (2019), Declaration on Public Sector Innovation, OECD, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0450.
• OECD (2017), Fostering Innovation in the Public Sector, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264270879-en.
• OECD (2014), Recommendation of the Council on Digital Government Strategies, OECD Publishing, https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0406.
• OECD (2010), Public Administration after “New Public Management”, Value for Money in Government, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264086449-en.
• OECD (2009), Rethinking e-Government Services: User-Centred Approaches, OECD e-Government Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264059412-en.
• OECD (Forthcoming), Draft Recommendation for Consultation Human-centred Public Administrative Services, OECD, https://www.oecd.org/en/events/public-consultations/2024/07/draft-recommendation-for-consultation-human-centred-public-administrative-services.html#:~:text=The%20OECD’s%20Public%20Governance%20Committee,experience%20as%20a%20core%20consideration.
• OECD/UNESCO (2024), G7 Toolkit for Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/